Showing posts with label fictional biographies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fictional biographies. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 24, 2024


THOMAS MANN
Doctor Faustus

"With a people like ours,” I said, “the psychological is always the primary and really motivating factor; political action is of the second order, reflex, expression, instrument."



Monday, September 23, 2024


THOMAS MANN
Doctor Faustus

It is only annoying - if you don't want to call it pleasant - that in music - at least in music - there are things for which, even with the best will in the world, no truly characterizing adjective, or combination of adjectives, can be found in the whole realm of language. I have been struggling with this for a few days - you cannot find an adequate term for the spirit, the attitude, the gesture of this theme. Because there is a lot of gesture in it. Tragically bold? Defiant, emphatic, the spirit driven to the sublime? All of this is not good. And 'splendid'! Of course, that is just a silly capitulation. In the end you end up with the factual prescription, the name: Allegro appassionato, that is the best.



Sunday, September 22, 2024


THOMAS MANN
Doctor Faustus

It seems to me, however, that despite the logical, moral rigor music may appear to display, it belongs to a world of spirits, for whose absolute reliability in matters of human reason and dignity I would not exactly want to put my hand in the fire. That I am nevertheless devoted to it with all my heart is one of those contradictions which, whether a cause for joy or regret, are inseparable from human nature.



Saturday, September 21, 2024


THOMAS MANN
Doctor Faustus

Nature in her creative dreaming, dreamt the same thing both here and there, and if one spoke of imitation, then certainly it had to be reciprocal. Should one take the children of the soil as models because they possessed the depth of organic reality, whereas the ice flowers were mere external phenomena? But as phenomena, they were the result of an interplay of matter no less complex than that found in plants.

If I understood our friendly host correctly, what concerned him was the unity of animate and so-called inanimate nature, the idea that we sin against the latter if the boundary we draw between the two spheres is too rigid, when in reality it is porous, since there is no elementary capability that is reserved exclusively for living creatures or that the biologist could not likewise study on inanimate models.