Showing posts with label censorship. Show all posts
Showing posts with label censorship. Show all posts

Monday, August 19, 2024

Reading

Richard Aldington
DEATH OF A HERO

-

From Wikipedia:

Aldington, a veteran of World War I, claimed that his novel was accurate in terms of speech and style. It contained extensive colloquial speech, including profanity, discussion of sexuality and graphic descriptions of the war and of trench life. There was extensive censorship in England and many war novels had been banned or burned as a result. When Aldington first published his novel, he redacted a number of passages to ensure the publication of his book would not be challenged. He insisted that his publishers include a disclaimer in the original printing of the book with the following text:

To my astonishment, my publisher informed me that certain words, phrases, sentences, and even passages, are at present taboo in England. I have recorded nothing which I have not observed in human life, said nothing I do not believe to be true. At my request the publishers are removing what they believe would be considered objectionable, and are placing asterisks to show where omissions have been made. In my opinion it is better for the book to appear mutilated than for me to say what I don't believe.

Sunday, January 21, 2024


GEORGE BERNARD SHAW
Mrs. Warren’s Profession
(1898)

All censorships exist to prevent anyone from challenging current conceptions and existing institutions. All progress is initiated by challenging current conceptions, and executed by supplanting existing institutions. Consequently, the first condition of progress is the removal of censorship.



Sunday, September 25, 2022


JUSTICE POTTER STEWART
Concurring opinion in U.S. Supreme Court, Jacobellis v. Ohio [1964]
____________________

I shall not today attempt further to define [pornography]. But I know it when I see it and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.

-

The film in question was Louis Malle's THE LOVERS.