Jacques Lacan from The Triumph of Religion
I did not
write Écrits in order for people to understand them, I wrote them in
order for people to read them. Which is not even remotely the same
thing. People don’t understand anything, that is perfectly true, for a
while, but the writings do something to them. And this is why I would be
inclined to believe that—as opposed to what one imagines when one peers
from the outside—people do read them. One imagines that people buy my
Écrits but never open them. That’s false. They even wear themselves out
working on them.
Obviously, when one begins my Écrits, the best
thing one can do is to try to understand them. And since one does not
understand them, one keeps trying. I didn’t deliberately try to make
them such that people don’t understand them— that was a consequence of
circumstance.I spoke, I gave classes that were very coherent and
comprehensible, but, as I turned them into articles once a year, that
led to writings which, compared to the mass of things I had said, were
incredibly concentrated and that must be placed in water, like Japanese
flowers, in order to unfold. The comparison is worth whatever it’s
worth.
No comments:
Post a Comment